Wave video Review 2025: An Honest Look at This Online Video Platform
Wave video Review 2025 An Honest Look at This Online Video Platform
Video has become undeniably essential in today’s digital landscape. It’s no longer just important; it’s a core component for everything from engaging social media posts and professional live broadcasts to comprehensive training materials. To create this diverse range of content, businesses and individual creators require powerful, reliable tools. The market offers countless options, each claiming to be the perfect solution for all video-related needs. Among these many contenders, Wave.video presents itself as a notable all-in-one online video platform.
With numerous platforms vying for attention and resources, discerning which one truly delivers can be challenging. Does Wave.video live up to its potentially game-changing claims? Or are there significant hurdles users encounter in practice? This comprehensive wave video review for 2024 aims to provide clarity by exploring exactly what real users are experiencing.
We understand the frustration and wasted effort that comes with investing in a platform that fails to meet expectations. Technical issues, difficult interfaces, or simply lacking crucial features can seriously disrupt your content strategy and consume valuable time. That’s why we’ve delved into recent `user feedback`, looking past marketing claims to understand the practical reality of using Wave.video in day-to-day operations.
While direct, hands-on testing offers valuable insights, gathering perspectives from a variety of recent users provides a different, equally crucial view: that of people utilizing the platform for their actual projects consistently. This article specifically draws upon recent user reviews found on platforms like Trustpilot to give you an up-to-date snapshot of current sentiment and performance observations regarding this `online video platform`.
Consider this review a practical reality check before you potentially commit. We will examine Wave.video’s central promise, detail its advertised core features, investigate user reports regarding its performance and reliability, summarize the advantages and disadvantages based on this feedback, and ultimately, help you assess if this specific `online video platform` aligns with your video marketing objectives, or if the latest user experiences suggest caution is advisable. It’s designed to provide an honest look based on the available information.
Introduction: What is Wave.video and Why Are Users Talking About It?
Introduction What is Wave.video and Why Are Users Talking About It
Let’s begin by clarifying what Wave.video is positioned to be. The company describes it as much more than a basic video editor; it’s pitched as a holistic, all-in-one solution, specifically designed as a comprehensive `online video platform` catering to video marketers and businesses. Their core message emphasizes streamlining workflows by consolidating multiple essential tools into a single environment, aiming to eliminate the need to manage various subscriptions or constantly transfer files between different applications.
Wave.video claims to integrate “5 must-have products for successful video marketing.” These include a live streaming studio, a video recording application, a robust video editor, a dedicated thumbnail maker, and significantly, video hosting capabilities. This broad scope of features is ambitious, suggesting a seamless process from content creation right through to its distribution.
In today’s content-driven world, where video dominates feeds, websites, and communication channels, having a reliable and efficient toolset is absolutely critical. Businesses need the capacity to create engaging videos rapidly, host live events without technical hitches, record high-quality content easily, design attention-grabbing visuals for their videos, and possess a dependable place to store and share everything. Wave.video aims to address all these needs within one integrated ecosystem, striving to be a complete `online video platform`.
But why has Wave.video become a subject of significant discussion among users? The conversation often arises from the disparity between a platform’s advertised potential and its actual performance in real-world scenarios. When a tool presents itself as a comprehensive, all-in-one solution, users expect high levels of performance, stability, and ease of use across all included features. If even one component within this integrated suite underperforms or experiences issues, it can disrupt the entire workflow more severely than if separate, specialized tools were being used.
This is precisely where user reviews provide invaluable insight. They offer a direct view into the daily operational reality of using the platform, highlighting successful applications as well as, crucially, exposing areas of frustration. Recent feedback, especially found on review sites like Trustpilot, serves as a vital current pulse check on the platform’s state. By examining these discussions, we can uncover whether the “all-in-one” promise truly translates into a smooth and effective user experience, or if users are consistently encountering obstacles, informing our `wave video review`.
Therefore, the primary objective of this particular `wave video review` is to illuminate these real user experiences. By analyzing recent public feedback, we aim to offer an honest perspective that complements and potentially contrasts the company’s official description. We want to help you understand if Wave.video is currently fulfilling its potential as a leading `online video platform` or if reported issues might warrant caution. Using the available information, we will explore its advertised functionalities, delve into user-reported performance and support experiences, dissect the perceived pros and cons, and ultimately provide a summary to help you determine if this platform is worth considering for your video content requirements.
Wave.video Core Features Overview: The All-in-One Promise Explored
Wave.video Core Features Overview The All-in-One Promise Explored
Wave.video’s primary selling proposition is its claim to function as a comprehensive all-in-one `online video platform`. This implies it’s designed to manage the entire lifecycle of video marketing content, from initial concept and creation through to final distribution and hosting. Let’s break down the five main product areas they emphasize, based on their own description, and understand the specific user problems each aims to solve.
Video Editor: Crafting Your Visual Story
A robust video editor is typically the central component of many video platforms, and Wave.video features its own. This is the space where users are intended to combine raw footage, stock media assets, text overlays, graphical elements, and music to produce a polished final video. Content creators fundamentally require an editor that is both powerful and intuitive. Tools for trimming, cutting, merging segments, adding transitions, incorporating brand elements, and ensuring the message is clear and engaging are essential. Wave.video positions its editor as a cornerstone for creating diverse video content, suitable for social media, advertisements, or more detailed explanations.
Live Streaming Studio: Connecting with Your Audience in Real-Time
Live streaming has rapidly become a vital tool for direct audience engagement, used for everything from webinars and interactive Q&A sessions to product launches and virtual events. A reliable live streaming studio is necessary for broadcasting professional content directly to major platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and others. Users need capabilities such as multi-camera input, screen sharing functions, customizable branding options, audience interaction tools, and critically, stable, uninterrupted performance. Wave.video includes this as one of its core pillars, aiming to equip users with the ability to connect live with their audience directly, without the need for separate, potentially complex broadcasting software.
Video Recording App: Capturing Your Message
Beyond live interaction, the ability to record video content easily is also a crucial need. This could involve recording your computer screen for software tutorials, capturing webcam footage for talking-head style videos, or recording presentations. Integrating a dedicated video recording app within the platform streamlines the workflow significantly, allowing users to capture their content directly within the same ecosystem they will use for editing or streaming. This helps solve the common problem of needing external recording software and simplifies the process of importing content into the editor.
Thumbnail Maker: The Visual Hook
The video thumbnail is the first visual element a potential viewer sees before deciding whether to click and watch. This small image plays an incredibly important role; it serves as the initial impression and is a key factor in driving clicks. A dedicated thumbnail maker assists users in creating compelling visuals that accurately represent their video’s content and effectively attract viewers. Features such as pre-designed templates, image editing tools, and text overlay options are vital here. Including this tool means users avoid the extra step of exporting a video frame or using external graphic design software solely for creating this crucial piece of metadata.
Video Hosting: Your Hub for Content Delivery
After a video is created, refined, and given an appealing thumbnail, it requires a place to reside online. While many users rely on widely used platforms like YouTube or Vimeo, having integrated video hosting within a platform offers advantages like enhanced control over the viewer’s experience, the absence of competing video suggestions, and often better integration options for embedding on websites. Wave.video incorporates video hosting, positioning itself not only as a creation tool but also functioning effectively as a `video upload website` and a central location for distribution on various `video posting websites` (referring to your own websites, blogs, etc.). This capability allows users to manage their entire video library directly within Wave.video, embed videos seamlessly on their own digital properties without exclusive reliance on external services, and potentially gain valuable insights into viewer engagement.
In addition to these central tools, Wave.video promotes access to a substantial library of assets, claiming “over 200M of stock videos, photos, and audio tracks and over 1000 customizable video templates.” This extensive library is intended to accelerate and simplify the content creation process, providing users with professional-quality resources to enhance their videos without needing to source assets externally. For someone seeking an `online video platform` that streamlines the entire workflow, the combination of integrated creation tools, hosting capabilities, and a vast asset library appears highly attractive on paper. It aims to directly address the common user problem of fragmented workflows and scattered resources.
User Experience & Performance: What Do Reviews Reveal?
User Experience & Performance What Do Reviews Reveal
The true measure of any software platform, especially a critical tool like an `online video platform`, lies in its performance when used by real people for actual projects. While the stated list of features is impressive, the day-to-day user experience, system reliability, and overall performance are the factors that genuinely matter. As our analysis is based on interpreting available user feedback rather than conducting hands-on testing, this section will explore the recurring themes and specific points highlighted by recent reviewers, constructing a picture of their actual experiences with Wave.video.
It’s essential to frame this discussion by acknowledging the source: a limited collection of recent reviews (specifically, 6 reviews on Trustpilot as noted in the source). This does not represent a comprehensive survey covering thousands of users, but it does offer valuable individual accounts and points out potential areas of both praise and concern that motivated these particular users to share their feedback publicly. We will explore what these specific reviewers reported regarding their `wave video review` experiences.
Reported Reliability & Performance Issues: When Things Go Wrong
Reliability is one of the most critical attributes for any software, especially for tools used for live events or time-sensitive content creation. Unfortunately, based on some of the recent reviews we have examined, this appears to be a notable area of concern for certain users. The feedback strongly suggests the presence of technical problems that directly impede the effective use of the platform, particularly impacting the live streaming and editing functionalities.
Specific complaints paint a picture of frustrating encounters. Phrases like “Livestream stuck badly” indicate severe disruptions occurring during live broadcasts, which can be disastrous for businesses relying on these events for essential communication, sales activities, or audience engagement. A livestream freezing is far more than just an inconvenience; it can severely damage credibility, result in a loss of audience, and waste significant preparation time. The review mentioning a “1 hour live completed in 3.5 hours” further illustrates the magnitude of these technical difficulties, suggesting lengthy periods of inactivity or troubleshooting were required during a process that should ideally be smooth and efficient.
Other reviews report more general performance issues such as experiencing a “server problem” and describing the platform overall as “glitchy.” Server-side issues can manifest in various ways, including slow loading times, inability to save ongoing work, unexpected disconnections, and general unresponsiveness, all of which hamper productivity. A “glitchy” editor or recording application can introduce errors into the final video output, lead to frustrating editing sessions, and result in wasted effort. A specific bug noted involved “Images rotate in the videos,” a seemingly minor issue but one that requires extra editing time (“spending time…to then realise it has to be edited to fix”) to correct, adding unnecessary steps to the workflow and eroding confidence in the platform’s fundamental functionalities.
These reports, particularly coming from recent reviews (e.g., November 2024, January 2024, assuming these represent current feedback), suggest that these might not be isolated incidents but potentially ongoing issues affecting users currently utilizing the platform. For individuals or businesses depending on an `online video platform` for critical tasks such as hosting live events or delivering client projects, such reliability concerns represent a significant warning signal. The core user requirement is a tool that simply works consistently, allowing them to concentrate on creating content rather than resolving technical issues.
Support and Community: A Lifeline When Needed?
In contrast to the technical issues reported by some users, other reviews (including some older positive feedback that contributes to the platform’s overall score) highlight a potentially positive aspect: the quality of support and the community surrounding Wave.video. While recent negative reviews do not specifically mention support successfully resolving their detailed technical problems, older positive comments explicitly praised the company’s support system.
Remarks such as “The support is great” and “the Facebook community is awesome” suggest that, at least for some users at certain times, there has been a positive experience when seeking assistance and interacting with fellow users. Responsive and knowledgeable support is crucial for any software, and especially for a complex `online video platform` offering multiple features. Users need confidence that when they encounter problems or simply have operational questions, there is a capable and ready team available to help.
A vibrant user community can also serve as a valuable resource, facilitating peer-to-peer support, enabling the sharing of useful tips and strategies, and fostering a sense of connection. For those who have had positive experiences with it, Wave.video’s community appears to be a positive attribute. These positive reports also included the perception that the company “values their customers” and “constantly add new features,” suggesting a perceived commitment to continuous platform improvement and being attentive to its user base – at least as described by those particular reviewers from the past.
However, it is important to note the apparent disparity. While some reviewers commended support in the past, the recent negative reviews detailing serious technical failures do not publicly state that these issues were successfully resolved by the support team. This disparity might leave a potential user questioning whether the positive support experiences remain the current norm, or if the nature of the reported problems makes them difficult to fix, irrespective of the support team’s quality. While the presence of positive feedback regarding support offers some encouragement, the severity of recent performance complaints presents a significant counterpoint within this `wave video review` context.
Pros & Cons: Balancing the Feedback for Your Wave.video Review
Pros & Cons Balancing the Feedback for Your Wave.video Review
Every software platform inherently possesses its strengths and weaknesses. Based on the company’s own description of its features and the limited but informative user reviews we have analyzed, we can compile a list of potential advantages and disadvantages associated with this `online video platform`. This summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list covering every minor detail, but rather a highlight of the key points that emerge most prominently from the available information, assisting you in weighing the various aspects during your own evaluation process for a thorough `wave video review`.
Wave.video Advantages (Pros): The Potential and the Promises
When considering the positive aspects, derived either from the company’s claims or highlighted in some user feedback, several points make Wave.video potentially appealing:
1. **All-in-One Platform Approach:** The most significant claimed advantage is the strategic effort to integrate multiple essential tools – video editing, live streaming, recording, thumbnail creation, and hosting – within a single unified environment. For users who find managing and paying for several different services cumbersome, this consolidation promises a streamlined workflow and potentially a more cost-effective solution. It aspires to be a true `online video platform` capable of handling the entire process from content production to online publication.
2. **Extensive Library of Stock Assets and Templates:** The reported access to over 200 million stock items and 1000 customizable templates is a substantial benefit. This provides users with a vast collection of resources to enhance their videos quickly, significantly reducing the need to source or create everything from scratch. For marketers working under tight deadlines, this capability can represent considerable time savings.
3. **Dedicated Support and Community (Based on Some Reports):** As mentioned previously, certain users have reported positive interactions with Wave.video’s support team and its active Facebook community. The reassurance of knowing that assistance is available and a community exists for sharing knowledge can be particularly helpful, especially for users who may be new to some of the platform’s advanced features.
4. **Perceived Commitment to Feature Development and Customer Value (Based on Some Reports):** Positive feedback from the past suggested a perception that the company regularly introduces new features and genuinely values customer input. This indicates a platform that is actively being developed and improved over time, which is often a favorable sign for users planning for long-term engagement.
5. **Comprehensive Functionality Including Integrated Hosting:** The inclusion of video hosting means Wave.video effectively functions as a dedicated `video upload website` and is well-suited for embedding videos across various `video posting websites` (meaning your own websites, blogs, etc.). This capability lessens dependence on external third-party hosting services for users who desire more direct control over how their embedded content appears and performs.
6. **Positioned as a Potentially Affordable Solution:** While specific pricing details were not included in the source material for this analysis, the company description generally positions it as a competitive option, particularly when considering the combined cost of subscribing to multiple separate tools that would replicate Wave.video’s feature set. Affordability is a significant decision factor for many businesses and content creators, making this potential benefit worth noting.
Wave.video Disadvantages (Cons): The User-Reported Challenges
Wave.video Disadvantages (Cons) The User-Reported Challenges
Turning to the disadvantages, the user reviews we examined, particularly the recent negative ones, highlight significant concerns:
1. **Significant Technical Issues Reported by Recent Users:** This point appears to be the most critical drawback based on the analyzed reviews. Severe problems such as livestreams freezing unexpectedly, the platform being generally described as “glitchy,” reports of server problems, and specific bugs like images rotating incorrectly in videos strongly suggest potential instability within the platform’s core functionalities. For a platform centered around video marketing activities, technical unreliability presents a major obstacle to effective use.
2. **Concerns About Overall Reliability and Server Performance:** The collection of reported technical issues collectively leads to concerns regarding the platform’s fundamental reliability. Users must be able to trust that their software tools will perform correctly when needed, especially for live events or client-facing projects. Reports mentioning “server problems” could indicate underlying infrastructure issues that might potentially affect all users.
3. **Templates Perceived as Outdated or Focus Shifting:** One specific negative review mentioned that the “templates have gone old” and felt the company’s primary focus might be moving away from the core video creation aspect itself. If the provided templates are not regularly updated or relevant to current trends, it diminishes the value of that extensive asset library and could suggest that the fundamental video editing and creation components might not be receiving as much developmental attention as other areas (perhaps live streaming or hosting). This observation counters the stated advantage of having a large asset library if its quality or relevance is not consistently maintained.
4. **Quality of Experience May Have Deteriorated Over Time:** One review implicitly suggested a comparison to a past experience that was more positive (“but something is clearly broken now… Wave was good back when”). This implies that the platform’s performance or reliability might have declined over a period of time, which represents a worrying trend for existing users and introduces risk for potential new customers.
5. **Lack of Company Replies to Negative Reviews on the Platform:** On the specific review platform observed (Trustpilot, as indicated in the source), the note that the company “Hasn’t replied to negative reviews” is a potential warning sign. While companies are not strictly required to respond to every review, failing to publicly address specific, detailed complaints about critical technical failures can leave users feeling ignored and might cause potential customers to question the company’s responsiveness when problems arise. This point stands in sharp contrast to the previously mentioned positive feedback regarding support from earlier periods.
Balancing these potential advantages and disadvantages, based on the limited data available, reveals a complex situation. The potential offered by the all-in-one suite concept and the large asset library is clear and appealing, but the recent user reports of significant technical problems cast a substantial shadow over these benefits. For anyone considering Wave.video, these reported issues are serious and warrant careful consideration and further investigation.
User Reviews & Overall Sentiment: What Trustpilot Shows
User Reviews & Overall Sentiment What Trustpilot Shows
To ground our analysis in the provided data, let’s focus specifically on the snapshot of user feedback from Trustpilot that served as the foundation for this review. This particular set of reviews, while small in number, offers an insight into recent user experiences and reflects the prevailing sentiment among those users who chose to share their thoughts on that specific platform. Understanding the source and its limitations is key to accurately interpreting the findings of this `wave video review`.
The overall score reported for Wave.video, based on these specific reviews, stands at 3.0 stars. On a standard 5-star rating scale, this rating represents a distinctly average sentiment. However, the simple overall score alone doesn’t convey the complete picture. The distribution of stars among the total of 6 reviews is particularly revealing: there is a high proportion of 5-star and 1-star ratings, with apparently no reviews falling into the 2, 3, or 4-star categories within this specific set. This polarized distribution strongly suggests that individual user experiences are highly variable – some users find the platform to be excellent, while others encounter significant issues that they perceive as deal-breakers.
Let’s recap the main themes emerging from these specific `Trustpilot reviews`:
Positive themes noted by some users:
- Comprehensive Feature Set: Users attracted to the platform appreciate the concept of having tools for editing, streaming, recording, thumbnail creation, and hosting (effectively functioning as a `video upload website` / hub for `video posting websites`) all conveniently located in one place. This wide range of functionality is clearly a significant draw for users seeking a simplified and streamlined workflow.
- Positive Support/Community Experience (Historically): As previously discussed, some older reviews mentioned positive interactions with both the support team and the Facebook community, indicating that during periods when the platform worked well for them, the company was perceived as responsive and supportive.
- Acknowledgement of Platform Potential: Even some of the critical reviews acknowledge the platform’s inherent potential and what it *could* become, suggesting that the fundamental concept and collection of features are valuable if they could be reliably implemented and maintained.
Negative themes reported by recent users:
- Significant Recent Technical Problems: This is the most prominent negative theme reported. The specific mentions of livestreams becoming stuck, general platform glitchiness, server issues, and specific bugs like images rotating incorrectly are serious complaints that directly hinder a user’s ability to successfully produce and deliver video content. These reports point towards potential instability in critical areas such as live broadcasting and video editing workflows.
- Perceived Decline in Quality or Template Relevance: One review’s comment about templates feeling outdated and a perceived shift in the company’s development focus away from core video creation is a specific form of criticism that speaks to the platform’s ongoing development priorities and whether the creative assets and core tools are being adequately maintained and updated. If these elements aren’t kept fresh and relevant, it can diminish the overall value proposition.
The clear contrast between the high and low star ratings, and the specific themes associated with each, represents the most significant takeaway from this limited dataset of reviews. It indicates that while the platform’s conceptual ambition as an all-in-one `online video platform` is appealing and some users may have positive experiences (potentially depending on which features they use most or their start date), there is also a segment of recent users who are encountering serious, fundamental functional problems.
Furthermore, the observation that the company “Hasn’t replied to negative reviews” on this particular platform adds another layer to the overall sentiment perceived from the company’s side. While this does not definitively mean that issues are not being addressed through other channels, the lack of public acknowledgment on a review site where users are voicing significant frustrations can contribute to a perception of indifference, particularly when those frustrations are related to core platform performance.
In summary, this particular snapshot of `user feedback` on Trustpilot presents a platform with significant aspirations as a comprehensive `online video platform`, valued by some for its broad feature set, but currently subject to reports of significant technical obstacles by others. The overall sentiment appears fragmented and polarized, reflecting user experiences that are either highly positive or markedly negative, with a discernible lean towards concern based on the severity of the most recent technical complaints.
Conclusion: Final Verdict – Is Wave.video the Right Online Video Platform for You?
Conclusion Final Verdict – Is Wave.video the Right Online Video Platform for You
We have conducted an honest assessment of Wave.video based on the available information: the company’s own description of its capabilities and the specific set of recent user reviews sourced from Trustpilot. Wave.video positions itself as a comprehensive, all-in-one `online video platform`, designed to equip marketers and businesses with everything needed for video content success – encompassing editing, live streaming, recording, thumbnail creation, and even serving as your dedicated `video upload website` and central hub for various `video posting websites`.
The platform’s promise is undoubtedly appealing. The concept of consolidating multiple essential tools into a single user interface, complemented by access to an extensive library of stock assets and templates, addresses genuine needs within the video marketing landscape. For users seeking simplicity and enhanced efficiency, this integrated approach represents, on paper, a compelling solution. It directly tackles the problem of needing separate software applications for different phases of the video workflow and simplifies the process of managing creative assets.
However, the overall picture becomes considerably more complex when we factor in the user feedback, particularly the recent reviews we analyzed. While some users in the past reported positive experiences with customer support and the platform’s development trajectory, the more recent reports highlight significant concerns regarding fundamental performance and reliability. Issues such as livestreams freezing unexpectedly, the platform being described as generally “glitchy,” reports of server problems, and specific bugs like images rotating incorrectly are not minor inconveniences. These reported issues directly impact a user’s capability to create and deliver video content effectively and maintain a professional standard.
The clear contrast between the platform’s ambitious array of features and the user-reported technical struggles creates a significant dilemma for potential users. The question arises: is Wave.video truly “worth it” at this time? Based *solely* on this limited dataset of user feedback, providing an unqualified “yes” is challenging. The seriousness of the technical problems reported by recent users raises substantial questions about the platform’s current stability, particularly within critical functionalities like live broadcasting and video editing environments.
So, considering these findings, who might still find Wave.video worth considering, and who should perhaps explore alternative options? Users who highly prioritize having a wide array of features consolidated under one roof and who value access to a large stock media library might still find the core concept of Wave.video appealing. The platform clearly *aims* to provide a unified multi-tool solution. However, for these users, the reports of performance issues necessitate proceeding with extreme caution and a thorough verification process. While Wave.video’s design addresses the *need* for a unified workflow, the *problem* of potentially unreliable execution appears present based on some recent feedback.
Conversely, users who absolutely require rock-solid reliability for crucial activities such as live streaming, or those who simply cannot afford to spend valuable time troubleshooting bugs and glitches within their editing process, should be particularly cautious based on these specific reviews. If your business or content strategy relies heavily on flawless live broadcasts or consistently efficient, error-free video production, the reported issues represent a notable risk factor. Your primary *need* is reliability, and according to some recent users, this particular `online video platform` might currently present *problems* in consistently delivering that reliability.
Our practical recommendation for anyone considering Wave.video in 2024, after reviewing this available feedback, is straightforward and crucial: **Engage in thorough due diligence that extends beyond just these few reviews.** Actively seek out a broader range of recent, in-depth reviews and user testimonials from various reputable sources. Most importantly, **make full use of any free trials or testing periods offered by Wave.video.** Do not commit to a paid subscription until you have rigorously tested the specific functionalities that are critical to *your* unique needs – pay particular attention to testing the live streaming studio and the video editor extensively. Conduct test broadcasts, create and export several videos of varying complexity, utilize the `video upload website` feature to host content, and embed videos on your own sites to evaluate how it performs in your actual usage scenario. Test the features that matter most to you.
The inherent potential of Wave.video as a comprehensive `online video platform` that simplifies a complex process is undeniable. However, the recent `user feedback` we have analyzed suggests that potential users must carefully assess whether the platform’s current performance truly aligns with its ambitious feature set and marketing claims. While the appeal of an all-in-one tool covering everything from creation to acting as your central hub for `video posting websites` is attractive, ensuring that the core features are stable and reliable in practice is absolutely paramount before making a final decision. Proceed with informed caution and comprehensive personal testing based on your specific requirements.
